Nancy Drew Review: …It’s a TV Show

You ever buy pizza from a supermarket?

The cheese doesn’t cook right, the toppings aren’t spread out right and the base is kind of papery. And then there’s the bite, you sink your teeth in and what you get taste like pizza but it doesn’t hit the same way the pizza you’d order in would taste. But its a Wednesday night, you’re tired, works been crap and the weekend is still an age away so something that’s warm and carby with a whisper of flavour will do for now.

That’s how I feel about the new Nancy Drew TV show

Who the hell is Nancy Drew


A1GTPf9yV5LNancy Drew might not be a familiar name to the audience this new CW show is trying to court but then again that’s kind of the point. She was a girl detective in books as far back as the 1930s, she’s been through so many iterations in this time but the heart of the character has always been an inquisitive intelligent girl getting to the bottom of mysteries.

In a way she was ahead of her time, headstrong and active main character it’s easy to see why she had an enduring popularity that spanned over a 150 books, tv shows and movies.

She’s a pop culture touchstone at this point and the inspiration for many female detective characters although as we progressed as a culture you can kind of see how- like many characters who had their heyday in the 1950s- she was relatively twee for her target audience now

Why reboot Nancy


I vaguely remember a couple of years ago they were floating around a Nancy Drew pilot where she was a cop in New York city, this was after the success of the Sherlock Holmes reboots in both Elementary and Sherlock. Nancy seemed like a logical reboot character we’re living in an age of constant reboots so why has Nancy never been given the same courtesy.

The first Nancy Drew reboot was during the 1990s featuring Nancy Drew as a criminology student in New York city and lasted a season, there was another failed pilot in the late 80s and the aforementioned recent pilot. But Nancy Drew never really captured the TV viewing audience.

But then the age of the reboot really got underway, Fuller House,90210 X-Files, Twin Peaks everything is coming back. An element of history made you sit up and take notice, there’s some studies about the eternal nostalgia of millennials that makes shows that have a backing behind them do well. There are very few shows these days that are entirely original, without at least a novel or a comic book as their main hook even if said TV show is entirely different.

Which brings us to our guy Riverdale, the gritty reboot of the Archie comics is a full on success with a connected Sabrina series attached. Nancy Drew seems like an obvious addition, an easy update to 2019, what could go wrong?

Nancy Drew for the CW

So we get to the pilot and our girl detective is retired. After the death of her mother she hung up her magnifying glass and graduated high school. She’s now working in a diner in her tiny hometown stuck. She’s in a casual relationship with Ned Nickerson and her frenemy George is now her boss. Nancy Drew is depressed and repressed and going nowhere fast.

And even before we’ve got a mystery this is where we run into our first problem.

Nancy Drew was brilliant, annoyingly so, in every iteration of Sherlock we saw a total embracement of this behaviour even if it was dickish. These guys were brilliant and new it straight off the bat, here at every turn Nancy Drew is seen apologising for what she’s doing and what she’s figuring out.

But why is this show hitting like this? In my opinion they seem to be following what works from it’s kind of cousin show, Riverdale. But Riverdale works with Archie as a kind of bland leading character because the world is supposed to make up the colour in Nancy’s world she’s supposed to be the colour. Here she’s conflicted about her mother’s death and overall just stuck, if we don’t know her history then Nancy doesn’t seem interesting at all which brings me to my next point.

The Nancy before

Veronica Mars - 2014

Although there hasn’t been a proper Nancy Drew TV reboot in the last, a girl detective became part of the cultural lexicon in a way that would define the genre. Veronica Mars. A neo-noir interpretation of a high-school girl detective, Veronica Mars drew the inevitable, um, Nancy Drew connations and readily embraced them for the new century. This version of a girl detective was smart, sassy, funny and a little dark, Veronica Mars became a cultural touchstone in her own right. So did the creators of this show not want to copy their kind of not really predecessor? They left this version of Nancy broken and a little loss as she tried to find her way. would it have really been so terrible for this Nancy to embrace her power in the same way as Veronica, Sherlock or the original Nancy Drew?

The mystery

In this version of Nancy Drew the driving plot of the story is the murder of Tiffany Hudson at the diner where Nancy Drew works. Nancy, Georgia, Bess, Ned and Ace are all suspects in her death and Nancy and her gang must work to find the real culprit. At the same time we’re presented with a twenty year old murder of former Sea Queen (homecoming queen watevs) Dead Lucy who may or may not be haunting the town.

Now we encroach on my main issue with this show…

To say I’m a connoisseur of good TV would be a god dam lie I watched every episode of Pretty Little Liars after all. But I do like a good mystery and for a good mystery you need a good victim.

In this version of Nancy Drew our main murder victim is Tiffany Hudson- who to the best of my knowledge isn’t even a character from the series (if she is feel free to send me hate I deserve it) the spoilt wife of Ryan Hudson, a kind of shady character who seems relatively removed from Nancy’s life. The character herself is a bored, overtly fancy wife of a character named Ryan Hudson who seems to have more of a relation to the characters however even here we’re left hanging for information.

We see Tiffany Hudson for all of two minutes within the pilot, she’s a caricature of a spoilt rich woman and she has no effect on anyone’s life so we don’t feel especially bad when she dies. This isn’t the best opening to a mystery.

If you look at similar shows, from Twin Peaks, Riverdale to Pretty Little Liars and Veronica Mars, hell even Broadchurch the death or disappearance was felt throughout the community which is why a small town murder mystery works so well. Lauren Palmer, the dead prom queen, Jason Blossom, the brother of the popular girl, Pretty Little Liars; the popular girl and Lily Kane…it’s all the mystery of this person that we find appealing and it gives space for the characters to grow without an overtly critical eye because hey they’re uncovering a mystery.

Here there may be a smattering of motive to kill her but no one grieves this character, not even her husband, the town isn’t moved by this murder. We don’t care that she’s dead because no one else does.

Which is why I think it shoehorned a plot about a dead prom queen which would of worked for the main plot but adding a prologue and occasional reference to her just seems like forgotten emotional labour.

The flicker of a good show


I regret not using Nancy Drew book puns as subtitles, if you’re writing something similar please Dm me and we will brainstorm.


This frozen pizza of a show does have some good points. Mainly acting, int his show mainly take place in one or two locations without much call for action leading the bulk of the interest to fall on the dialogue and the four main actors do a fantastic job. There’s genuinely chemistry between them and the campy, sarcastic and fun version of this show seems apparent when the four of them are together in the diner. I would hit the guys who play Ace and Bess as standouts.

It’s also a very slick TV show, it’s gorgeous to watch with a great colour palette and even though there seems to be only a few locations but everything about them is beautiful and it’s genuinely nice to watch.

I will keep watching, mainly because I’m a goblin with no tastebuds but also I want to see how this story progresses and how they cultivate those initial hurdles. There are some big names behind this show so I doubt my issues are just growing pains but rather integral points of the show as a whole.

Let me know what you think or what I got wrong in the comments down below…

Hasn’t Charmed Always Been A Feminist Show?

The planned reboot of Charmed is adding ‘feminist storyline’ but isn’t the whole show unapologetically feminist anyway? 

The Charmed reboot offically has a pilot order with the new tagline reading: “This fierce, funny, feminist reboot of the original series centers on three sisters in a college town who discover they are witches. Between vanquishing supernatural demons, tearing down the patriarchy, and maintaining familial bonds, a witch’s work is never done.”

Witchcraft has always been linked with female power which is why during the 18th century it caused just a slight murdery international panic. And Charmed reclaimed that within it’s first episodes, the Halliwell sisters were a martiarchy, powerful and well developed women. A feminist take on Charmed is like having well…a magical take on Charmed, the show just isn’t Charmed without feminism guiding it’s way through.

And this is echoed by Holly Marie Coombs on twitter who expressed feeling slightly peeved about the reboot. And it’s a fair point. Why is it a reboot without the support of anyone from the original show, even the Heathers reboot got a Shannen Doherty cameo.

I personally would have preferred the new Charmed to be a continuation of the show that ended in 2006. Although continuing the Roseanne reboot trend they should ignore the final season and any mention of Billy but timewise we are perfectly positioned for a teen Wyatt and Chris story and for Phoebe and Paige’s kids as well. There is a generation that would really  respond to the backstory built up by the old Charmed shows and you could easily modernise some of the issues.

Diversity was a glaring problem in the rewatch, race and sexuality were not topics discussed or touched upon. As a lot of the Charmed mythology was pulled from real concepts e.g. wicca, widening the diversity aspect of the show could pull through the inevitable dry spells a 22 episode season is going to go through.

I honestly don’t know why the Charmed reboot never worked there was a whole host of stories there, it could have easily done what 90210 did but with more magic and a bit more bite.

Despite everything I’m really excited for the Charmed reboot, screenwriting duo Amy Rardin and Jessica O’Toole who worked on Jane the Virigin, Selfie and Greek, shows I personally loved and are plentiful with wit and dry and humour which I believe made Charmed great.

But the proof will be in the pudding, a modern Charmed will have to be a good balance between the three sisters (a tricky task when most modern shows have a main cast of at least five) a magical element that doesn’t look like a bad Supernatural and a romantic element that doesn’t eclispe the overarching story.

I’d like to see it have the same episodic feel as the original Charmed but I’m guessing it’ll attempt a little bit more of a Riverdale style.

Casting ideas anyone?


Banning 13 Reasons Why won’t solve anything.

The controversial Netflix series 13 Reasons Why has become an international sensation, attracting attention for both its production and its handling of sensitive material.

Following the death of Hannah Baker, her classmate Clay Jensen receives a box of tapes from the recently deceased Hannah detailing the thirteen reasons why she committed suicide.

Since the show’s premiere on March 31, 2017,  it’s become something of a lightning rod for issues surrounding mental health and bullying in adolescence.

Whether it’s just a TV show or not has an expressed duty to handle these topics ethically. A school in Canada recently banned its students from discussing the show and New Zealand has banned under-18s watching it alone.

The Reality

The National Center of Health Statistics shows that suicide has passed homicide as the second leading cause of death amongst teenagers and it’s grown in all demographics. Whether the show or Jay Asher’s novel does anything to glamorise the subject, teenage suicide is a growing epidemic.

And as of this moment there is no mandatory mental health education in the classroom meaning that shows like 13 Reasons Why is the only way some people learn the warning signs of suicide.


Although there are ethical standards when it comes to the reporting of real suicide the academic study on the role of fictionalised suicide is comparatively less.

The show has received criticism from experts in the field due to it’s graphic nature being potentially triggering for those with depression and suicidal thoughts. A recent paper published by Columbia University said, “research on fictional suicide stories is contradictory, there is ample research evidence that highlights the imitative effect of suicide dramatisations.”

The show itself has been making strides to address some of the issues brought up after it’s premiere with the recent addition of the Thirteen Reasons Why crisis information page it’s not the best starting point but it’s the one we have and even producing youtube video talking about mental health.


Starting a conversation

Regardless of your opinions on the show it’s sparked a conversation that shouldn’t be ignored. Mental health struggles have often been seen as either romantic or crazy, not pieces of a puzzle built up over a period of time.  By giving the victim of suicide a voice we’re able to see how a terrible and heart breaking act was committed not in the heat of the moment or after one specific event as suicide is often flattened into one single reason.

I wouldn’t go as far as to say this show checks all of the boxes when it comes to ethical depicitions of suicide but trying to stop teenagers from seeing it isn’t helping anyone. Instead we should be using this show as a starting point and a framework of how to act and how not to act, of how grief affects us and how violence can be built up over a period of time and words we say can affect what someone else does tomorrow.

13 Reasons Why isn’t the answer but is instead posing a question to us how do we deal with the topic of teen suicide? And the answer certainly isn’t shutting the door.